This week we will discuss one of the requirements of the course Integrative Project Literature Review, that only evidence-based articles that report on experiments conducted by the article authors be used. This is a requirement of many an MA in Psych paper assignment. Why do you think that is the case? Think from the perspective of psychology as both a profession and an academic discipline. What is gained by focusing on evidence-based experimental articles? What may be lost as a result of this requirement?
Pasted the following Bolded Questions above your answers so all content is clearly included
- Why do you think that only evidence-based articles that report on experiments conducted by the article authors be used is the case? Think from the perspective of psychology as both a profession and an academic discipline.
- What is gained by focusing on evidence-based experimental articles?
- What may be lost as a result of this requirement?