Always look at the assessment criteria:
| Criteriaforperformanceevaluationreport(overallworth60%ofmodulemark) | Weighting |
| A performance analysis of the candidates drawing upon a completed paper based analysis of each of the candidates’ CVs and covering letters (using the criteria written for assessment one) and a completed performance based analysis of each of the candidates during the interview (drawing on the grading sheet designed for the interviews). Drawing upon these analysis instruments and academic theory, a critical reflection on the top two candidates’ ability to do the job focusing on knowledge and experiences of leadership, creating excellent group dynamics, and motivating, engaging and satisfying staff. | 40% |
| In table format, a short training and development plan for each of the top two candidates that identifies some training that they will benefit from in improving leadership, creating good team dynamics and motivating, engaging and satisfying employees. | 25% |
| Ashortcriticalanalysisabouttheadvantagesanddisadvantagesofdifferentstructures andhowthesecontributetotheculturewithinanorganisation. | 25% |
| Pack presented in a professional manner. Harvard referenced bibliography of resources drawn upon to aid in the completion of the pack. | 10% |
Post interviews: Performance
evaluation report
(3000 words)
Section one: 40% Circa 1000 -1500words (300-500 words per candidate)
Individually, you must undertake a performance analysis of the candidates. This analysis will
draw on:
• A completed paper based analysis of each of the candidates’ CVs and covering letters. To aid
you, you must use the criteria you wrote for assessment one (place the criteria and
completed scoring sheet for each candidate in the Appendices).
• A completed performance based analysis of each of the candidates during the interview. For
this you will need to draw on the ‘interview’ questions & grading system, you mutually
agreed within your 5 person team during Week 10 of the module. (place the completed
grading sheet for each candidate in the Appendices). BUT ……..
• Once you have undertaken these analyses of the candidates you must write a critical
reflection on the top two candidates’ ability to do the job focusing specifically on each
candidate’s knowledge and experiences of leadership, creating excellent group dynamics,
and motivating, engaging and satisfying staff. In so doing, you must show evidence of
drawing upon the analysis instruments and academic theory to provide a strong level of
critique. It would be best to integrate this into your 4-500 words per candidate.
Section two: (circa 750 words)
• To complete the analysis of the candidates you should also
provide a short training and development plan for the top two
candidates that identifies some training that they will benefit
from. This training should be directed towards improving
leadership, creating good team dynamics and motivating,
engaging and satisfying employees (25% – table format).
Section three: (circa 750 words)
• Chris has also requested you write a short critical analysis
about the advantages and disadvantages of different structures
and how these contribute to the culture within an organisation
as she recognises this also needs addressing within her
company (25% – approx. 800 words).