Managed Care Effects on Consumers

posted in: Research Paper | 0

Unit 6 Assignment – Managed Care Effects on Consumers

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 100
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

The Human Resources Department at your new job is now offering managed care plans. As a consumer, you want to research how the new plans would affect type of services you would receive.

Managed Care Effects on Consumers Instructions

  • Complete aspects of a research plan to help determine the impact of managed care on consumers.
  • Develop a thesis statement to address how managed care impacts consumers.
  • Create an outline of the effects of managed care on consumers. Your overall analysis (or tone of your assessment) of the effect of managed care can be either positive or negative. The outline should have three major points/topics and at least 3 supporting sub-topics under each main topic.
  • Select one of your main topics and write a paragraph summary (minimum 300 words) explaining how the effects of managed care have significantly impacted the physician-patient relationship, the physician’s ability to carry out ethical obligations, and the quality of patient care.
  • Be sure to review the resources provided in Supplemental Resources to help prepare you for the assessment.
  • Submit all three parts of this assessment in the same document.

Managed Care Effects on Consumers Rubric

Unit 6 Assignment – Managed Care Effects on Consumers

Unit 6 Assignment – Managed Care Effects on Consumers
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
10.0

ptsLevel 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.

9.0

ptsLevel 4

Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.

8.0

ptsLevel 3

Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.

7.0

ptsLevel 2

Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.

6.0

ptsLevel 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.

0.0

ptsLevel 0

Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.

10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views
10.0

ptsLevel 5

Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).

9.0

ptsLevel 4

Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

8.0

ptsLevel 3

Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

7.0

ptsLevel 2

Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.

6.0

ptsLevel 1

Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.

0.0

ptsLevel 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0

ptsLevel 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18.0

ptsLevel 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

16.0

ptsLevel 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14.0

ptsLevel 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12.0

ptsLevel 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0

ptsLevel 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
20.0

ptsLevel 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18.0

ptsLevel 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16.0

ptsLevel 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14.0

ptsLevel 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

12.0

ptsLevel 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

0.0

ptsLevel 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

20.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
20.0

ptsLevel 5

Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.

18.0

ptsLevel 4

Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.

16.0

ptsLevel 3

Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.

14.0

ptsLevel 2

Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

12.0

ptsLevel 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.

0.0

ptsLevel 0

States an illogical conclusion from findings.

20.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications
10.0

ptsLevel 5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

9.0

ptsLevel 4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

8.0

ptsLevel 3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

7.0

ptsLevel 2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6.0

ptsLevel 1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0.0

ptsLevel 0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

10.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5.0

ptsLevel 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English languageconventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5

ptsLevel 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0

ptsLevel 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5

ptsLevel 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0

ptsLevel 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0

ptsLevel 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0

ptsLevel 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5

ptsLevel 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0

ptsLevel 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5

ptsLevel 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0

ptsLevel 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0

ptsLevel 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0pts
Total Points: 100.0

PreviousNext

 

Last Updated on December 13, 2020 by EssayPro