Complete an annotated table of contents for the Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia.
Here are the guidelines for creating an annotated table of contents: Whereas an ordinary table of contents gives headings and subheadings with page numbers to enable readers to quickly find information, annotated tables of contents briefly explain what each heading or subheading contains.
Take the existing table of contents, duplicate it in your document, and provide succinct and comprehensive annotations for each heading that appears in the table of contents. You’ll need to read and synthesize the information and report it in your own words.
Do not cut and paste from the source document to yours–this would be plagiarism. Remember to include page numbers, subheadings and appendices along with all headings. You may single-space this assignment.
You may use a table if formatting becomes a problem. This assignment typically runs 12 -16 pages long
Regulations Governing Special Education Programs for Children with Disabilities in Virginia link
.
http://econ.ucsb.edu/~tedb/eep/anntoc2.html shortened example one
shortened example two
Annotated Tables of Contents Project Rubric—40 points maximum
| Not Acceptable (0-27 points) | Acceptable (28-35 points) | Exemplary (36-40 points) | |
| Formatting | Formatting does not consistently delineate annotations from table of contents entries. Page numbers have been omitted. (0 – 5.4 points) | Formatting clearly and consistently delineates annotations from table of contents entries. Page numbers are included. (5.6 – 7.18 points) | Formatting uses a number of elements (e.g., bold font, italics) to delineate the content. Resulting document is clear and professional. Page numbers are included. (7.2 – 8 points) |
| Comprehension of the Content | Annotations indicate incomplete or erroneous understanding of the material. (0 – 5.4 points) | Annotations clearly indicate an accurate understanding of material. (5.6 – 7.18 points) | Annotations indicate a strong, analytical understanding of the material. (7.2 – 8 points) |
| Conciseness | Annotations are not concise and do not act as an adequate guide to finding specific content quickly. Subheadings are incomplete or have been omitted. (0 – 5.4 points) | Annotations are concise and act as a guide to finding specific content. Subheadings are included. (5.6 – 7.18 points) | Annotations allow the reader to make an effective search of the annotated document by providing a succinct guide to the content. Subheadings are included. (7.2 – 8 points) |
| Completeness | One or more publications are missing from the assignment. (0 – 5.4 points) | All required publications have been annotated. (5.6 – 7.18 points) | An additional publication has been included in the submission. (7.2 – 8 points) |
| Writing Competence | Poor writing that evidences improper sentence structure, poor idea development, and grammatical errors. (0 – 5.4 points) | Clear writing that includes proper sentence structure, idea development, and grammar. (5.6 – 7.18 points)
| Writing is superior, professional, and includes proper sentence structure, idea development, and grammar. (7.2 – 8 points) |