Data Collection Plan

Data Collection Plan (100 points) and Discussion Board (50 points)

Custom Essay Writers for Hire


Purpose
: To assess ability to synthesize key course concepts and the ability to design and implement a data
collection and analysis plan (Objectives 1 – 5).
Due date: Sunday of Week 5 (draft and initial discussion participation is due by Wednesday)
Submitted: Blackboard
Throughout the course, students should be thinking about their clinical scholarly projects and how key concepts
are generally or specifically related to the project. The signature assignment in this course is a draft of the
metholdology chapter of the clinical scholarly project which will explain the expected data collection and
analysis.
This Week 5 assignment is a PowerPoint presentation of your intended data collection and analysis
plan. The goal of the assignment is to assess students’ readiness to do the final assignment in the course and the
oral defense of the clinical scholarly project. The focus of the assignment is on developing a clear vision of (a)
what should be done in a clinical scholarly project to collect, analyze and interpret data appropriately.
This assignment must be submitted by Sunday, end of Week 5. Students must use the assignment template
provided in and attach a PowerPoint file.
Students are expected to use the feedback they got from their instructor on previous assignments as they prepare
for this assignment. Students are encouraged to work with classmates, instructors, and mentors/chairs when
preparing the assignment. However, this assignment is not group work. Each student’s final presentation file
should be unique to the student and reflect his/her background, experience, expertise, integrity, and specific
doctoral project.
The assignment consists of two parts:
Part I. PowerPoint Presentation (100 Points)
The student should prepare a PowerPoint presentation, including slides and presenter notes (not a narrated or
video presentation). It should be organized in the format shown below. Students should choose
the most
important quantitative outcome of the clinical scholarly project
as the topic of the Analysis Plan. Students
should make sure that the audience will understand what change in practice s/he will be evaluating, why it is an
important problem, why s/he is predicting the results s/he is predicting, and how the results will impact nursing
practice if s/he achieves them. The project will draw heavily on the project proposal developed in DNPU 706.
Slide 1 – Title and Author
Slide 2 – Problem statement (brief explanation of the background and significance of the clinical scholarly
project)
Slide 3 – Claim (predicted result of the clinical scholarly project)
Slide 4 – Evidence (statistical evidence from the literature review to support the claim)
Slide 5 – Reasoning (explanation of how the evidence supports the claim; include a clear statement of the
analysis planned and the predicted result)
Slide 6 – Implications (what are the implications of your study on EBP?)
Slide 7 – Sample (describe your sample and the population it is drawn from)

Slide 8 – Variables (Identify your primary outcome and predictor variable(s))
Slide 9 – Collection Plan and Timeline (Briefly describe the data collection plan – may use up to two slides)
Slide 10 – References (alphabetical list of citations in APA format)
Part II. Draft Feedback and Discussion
You will post a DRAFT of this plan to the class discussion by Wednesday of Week 5 along with a 1-2
paragraph CER Summary of your plan (typed into the discussion). Your classmates will have an opportunity to
provide feedback by
Saturday, and you will submit a final draft of this plan by Sunday, midnight.
Student work will be graded with a rubric and individual feedback from instructors will be posted. Students are
expected to use the feedback in preparing for the final assignment.

The Data Collection Plan (100) will be graded using the rubric below.

Still looking for Academic writing help? Get it here.

Exemplary 4 Proficient 3 Developing 2 Emerging 1
Problem
(2.5)
Clear and concise
explanation of the
significance of the
problem
Adequate explanation
of the significance of
the problem
Explanation of the
significance of the
problem lacks focus
Nature of the
problem is not clear
Organization/CER (5) Insightful, clear, and
thorough use of CER
approach evident in
presentation
Adequate use of CER
approach evident in
presentation
Attempt to use CER
approach in
presentation
CER approach not
used in presentation
Implications (5) Synthesizes data to
provide a clearly
appropriate
justification to the
audience
Provides a clear
justification to the
audience
Provides a poorly
explained
justification to the
audience
Does not provide a
justification to the
audience
Sample and Variables
(5)
Clearly defines
sample, recruitment
strategy, and the
population it is drawn
from (AND)
Appropriately
identifies variables.
Defines sample, and
recruitment strategy,
but relationship to
population is unclear
(OR) Not all variables
are appropriately
identified.
Sample poorly
defined and
recruitment strategy
or relationship to
population is
unclear (AND) Not
all variables are
appropriately
defined.
No definition of
sample or
explanation of
variables.
Plan and Timeline
(3.75)
Collection plan is
appropriate and CSP
benchmarks (CSP
Handbook), identifies
collection tool, and is
realistic
Collection plan is
appropriate but may
not include
benchmarks, (OR)
does not clearly
identify collection
tool (OR) timeline
may be unrealistic.
Data collection plan
isn’t fully developed
or does not align
with CSP
benchmarks.
(AND/OR) Tool not
clearly identified.
(OR) No timeline
discussed.
No discussion of
data collection plan,
tools, or timeline.
Expression
(3.75)
Presentation is
engaging, and
communicates clearly
using appropriate
professional tone,
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation. No
errors in APA format.
Presentation
communicates clearly
with few errors in
professional tone,
grammar, spelling, or
punctuation. Few
errors in APA.
Presentation has
many distracting
errors in
professional tone,
grammar, spelling,
or punctuation.
Many errors in APA
format.
Presentation does
not communicate
clearly. (OR) APA
not used.

Presentation Feedback Discussion (50) will be graded with the following rubric (deadline is Saturday):

Exemplary 4 Proficient 3 Developing 2 Emerging 1
Original post (3.75) Fully responds to all questions
in DB Prompt with insightful
appraisal of evidence
Responds to all
questions, but lacks
development (AND)
Clear statement of
evidence and
conclusion
Does not respond
to all questions
(OR) Response
not in appropriate
format.
Does not respond
to all questions.
(AND) Response
not in appropriate
format.
Timeliness of
original posts
(1.25)
Initial post by Wednesday of
the assigned week.
Initial post by
Thursday of the
assigned week
Initial post by
Friday of the
assigned week
Initial post after
Friday of the
assigned week.
Comments on
Others’ Posts (3.75)
Provides relevant and helpful
feedback with insightful, clear,
and thorough use of CER
approach in discussions with
classmates.
Provides relevant
and helpful feedback
with use of CER
approach in
discussions with
classmates.
Responses lack
substance and
attempt to use
CER approach in
discussions with
classmates.
Poor response
quality
Engagement
(1.25)
Responses to at least three
classmates (AND) Responses
spread over more than two days
Responds to fewer
than three classmates
(OR) Responses on
two days.
Responds to two
classmates on
two days (OR) all
responses on one
day
Responds to one
classmate on one
day (OR) does not
respond to
classmates.
Expression and Format
(2.5)
Writing is graduate level and
engaging. (AND) Written
responses communicate clearly
using appropriate professional
tone, grammar, spelling, and
punctuation.
Writing is graduate
level and engaging.
(AND) Written
responses may not
communicate clearly,
use appropriate
professional tone, or
there may be a few
errors grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation without
detracting from
readability.
Writing may not
be graduate level.
(OR) Written
responses do not
communicate
clearly, use
appropriate
professional tone,
or there are
several errors
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation,
detracting from
overall
readability.
Poor writing
quality, poor
communication and
unprofessional
tone. (OR)
Extensive errors in
spelling, grammar,
or punctuation that
detract from the
readability.

Still looking for Academic writing help? Get it here.

Sample Draft Analysis Plan

Last Updated on April 25, 2020 by