Assignment Clinical Field Experience B: Assessment Analysis

Save Link

Assignment Clinical Field Experience B: Assessment Analysis

Essay Writing Software Subscription

View Rubric

Max Points: 50

Details:

Allocate at least 4 hours in the field to support this assignment.

Observe and collaborate with your mentor teacher on the topic of administering formative assessments. In your collaboration discuss the formative assessment process:

  • What types of formative assessment has your mentor teacher used or is currently using?
  • What type of data does the formative assessment process generate and how does your mentor teacher find this to be useful?
  • How does your mentor teacher use formative assessment to plan instruction?

Review data from at least one formative assessment your mentor teacher administered and discuss the plan of action related to filling in the gaps between what the students know and what they need to know.

Using any remaining field experience hours, assist the teacher in providing instruction and support to the class.

Write a 250-500 word reflection analyzing a formative assessment given in your mentor teacher’s classroom. Describe the action plan your mentor teacher plans to follow, based upon the results of the assessment, to fill in the gaps between what the students know and what they need to know.

Indicate the content area, grade level, type of assessment, and any other pertinent details. Include anonymous samples of the assessments and how you and your mentor teacher analyzed them.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

RUBRIC

Clinical Field Experience B: Assessment Analysis 

  1
No Submission
0.00%
2
Insufficient
69.00%
3
Approaching
74.00%
4
Acceptable
87.00%
5
Target
100.00%
100.0 %Criteria  
25.0 %Analysis of Formative Assessment Not addressed. Reflection does not analyze the formative assessment given in the mentor teachers’ classroom. Reflection inadequately analyzes the formative assessment given in the mentor teachers’ classroom. Reflection clearly analyzes the formative assessment given in the mentor teachers’ classroom. Reflection skillfully and concisely analyzes the formative assessment given in the mentor teachers’ classroom.
25.0 %Differentiated Instruction Based Upon Results Not addressed. Reflection does not describe the action plan the mentor teacher plans to follow based upon results of the assessment to fill in the gaps. Reflection inadequately describes the action plan the mentor teacher plans to follow based upon results of the assessment to fill in the gaps. Reflection clearly describes the action plan the mentor teacher plans to follow based upon results of the assessment to fill in the gaps. Reflection skillfully and concisely describes the action plan the mentor teacher plans to follow based upon results of the assessment to fill in the gaps.
20.0 %Content Area, Grade Level, Type of Assessment Not addressed. Reflection does not indicate the content area, grade level, type of assessment, and other pertinent details. Reflection inadequately indicates the content area, grade level, type of assessment, and other pertinent details. Reflection clearly indicates the content area, grade level, type of assessment, and other pertinent details. Reflection skillfully and concisely indicates the content area, grade level, type of assessment, and other pertinent details.
15.0 %Samples of Assessments and Analysis Not addressed. Reflection does not include anonymous samples of the assessments and their analysis. Reflection inadequately includes anonymous samples of the assessments and their analysis. Reflection clearly includes anonymous samples of the assessments and their analysis. Reflection thoroughly includes anonymous samples of the assessments and their analysis.
10.0 %Organization Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other; or the summary is widely outside of the required word count. The content is not adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The summary may not be within a reasonable range of the required word count. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within a reasonable range of the required word count. The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The summary is within the required word count.
5.0 %Mechanics Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
100 %Total Weightage

Essay Writing Software Subscription

Last Updated on June 10, 2019 by