1.) After reading the mini-cases and the Helms’ case, discuss your responses to the ethical hypotheticals on page 10 of the mini-cases. Why did you vote as you did?
2.) How would you compare the way in which ethical decisions were made in the cases? Do you see any inconsistencies or contradictions in these ethical decisions?
3.) Address the Dobel chapter and his concept of “political prudence.” How would you use this concept to alter your original judgments on the mini-cases and the Helms’ case? Explain your answer.