What is the main conclusion or conclusions that the author is arguing for?
Does the author try to justify the conclusions that they are arguing for?
If not, then explain what they are saying about the conclusions.
If they are justifying their conclusions, then what is the justification?
Discuss whether the author provides a strong convincing argument for their conclusions.
Does the author make reasonable assumptions and thoroughly explain how the premises lead to the conclusions?
What are the weakest parts of the arguments?
What is the most interesting part of the claims being made?