Brittany is serving as interim editor of the company newsletter. She receives an article written by the company president describing, in abstract and pompous language, the company’s goals for the coming year. Brittany thinks the article will need considerable revising to make it readable. Attached to the president’s article are complimentary comments by two of the company vice presidents. How would you handle this situation so that the company’s reputation is not damaged and so that the upper-level managers are not offended?
Our discussions are a valuable opportunity to have thoughtful conversations regarding a specific topic. You are required to provide a comprehensive initial post with 3-4 well-developed paragraphs that include a topic sentence and at least 3-5 supporting sentences with additional details, explanations, and examples. In addition, you are required to respond substantively to the initial posts of at least two other classmates. All posts should be reflective and well written, meaning free of errors in grammar, sentence structure, and other mechanics.